In reply to:
Tyler Brookings
@TQB12_
·
150d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
150d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
150d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the legitimacy of an audit and the qualifications of individuals involved, which are relevant to public accountability and transparency. The tone is critical and aims to clarify the appropriate process for conducting an audit.
- The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on the legitimacy of the audit process, adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in personal attacks or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by clarifying the appropriate qualifications for conducting an audit, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the qualifications of Elon Musk and his team without resorting to personal attacks, adhering to the principle of constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly questioning the qualifications of those involved in the audit process, using the platform with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.