In reply to:
~Michele~
@SeaPry
·
156d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of government restructuring and its implications on corruption and public welfare. It critiques the actions of dismantling government agencies like the Department of Education and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, suggesting these actions deflect from actual corruption and harm federal workers and children.
- The statement does not use harmful language but rather critiques policy actions, aligning with the principle of doing no harm with words. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement aims to promote understanding by highlighting potential negative impacts of government actions, aligning with promoting empathy and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of government actions without resorting to personal attacks, aligning with the principle of constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By critiquing government actions that may harm public welfare, the statement uses influence to advocate for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly critiquing government actions and policies. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.