In reply to:
Mike (Is Feeling The Spirit)
@realMike7668
·
157d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of national debt and government spending, critiquing the approach of cutting social programs while advocating for reducing tax breaks for the wealthy. It contributes to a broader debate on fiscal policy and economic priorities.
- The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on policy critique rather than personal attacks, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting the long-term costs of cutting social programs and suggests an alternative approach, aligning with promoting empathy and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of fiscal policy without resorting to personal attacks, adhering to the principle of constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By advocating for a change in fiscal policy that could benefit society, the statement uses influence for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement responsibly uses free speech to engage in a policy debate, upholding the principles of free speech and integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.