Rashida Tlaib

Rank 8 of 47
|
Score 175

The statement critiques the Pentagon's budget and audit failures, suggesting that efforts to address waste and corruption should focus on the Pentagon rather than social programs. It implies a critique of Elon Musk's priorities, suggesting a misalignment with addressing governmental inefficiencies.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not use harmful language but rather critiques government spending priorities.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding of government spending issues, encouraging scrutiny of the Pentagon's budget. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism of Musk's priorities but does not resort to personal attacks, maintaining a focus on policy critique. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to highlight potential governmental inefficiencies, aiming for societal betterment. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech responsibly by addressing public spending issues. [+1]