Reposted by Robert Costa
The statement discusses a significant public issue involving political figures and potential legal proceedings, which contributes to civic dialogue. It implies a request for a presidential pardon for a mayor involved in a federal corruption case, raising questions about legal and ethical standards in politics.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it could influence public perception of the individuals involved.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by not engaging in cyberbullying or hate speech, though it does bring attention to a sensitive legal matter.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on a legal and political issue.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it does not facilitate constructive dialogue either.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to inform the public about a significant political and legal issue, which could contribute to societal betterment by encouraging transparency and accountability. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly reporting on a matter of public interest. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.