Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement addresses a significant public issue involving government transparency and foreign aid, suggesting potential suppression of information by threatening employees. It raises concerns about freedom of speech and the ethical responsibilities of government agencies.
- The statement implies potential harm by suggesting that employees are threatened with dismissal for speaking to the press, which could prevent important information from reaching the public. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It raises privacy and dignity concerns by potentially intimidating employees into silence, which could be seen as a form of harassment. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote constructive dialogue, as it suggests punitive measures rather than open communication. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement implies a misuse of influence by potentially prioritizing control over transparency, which could undermine public trust. [-2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.