The statement critiques a financial agreement at the EPA, suggesting government corruption. It aims to inform and possibly incite scrutiny of public institutions.
- The statement may cause harm by potentially spreading distrust without full context. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy but could impact the dignity of those involved by implying corruption. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- It attempts to promote understanding of government actions but may lack empathy.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in criticism but could be seen as a personal attack on the agency. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- It uses its platform to highlight potential issues in governance. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.