The statement engages in public discourse by addressing issues of financial transparency and accountability within government and media. It critiques the handling of a financial story related to the EPA and questions the integrity of media coverage.
- The statement uses strong language but does not directly harm individuals, focusing instead on institutional critique.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, though it uses confrontational language.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks constructive dialogue, using derogatory terms and personal attacks, which undermines its critique. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.