In reply to:
MAZE
@mazemoore
·
321d
The statement is a part of a conversation that involves a public issue, specifically the use of taxpayer money by USAID and its implications on government integrity, which constitutes public discourse. The tone of the reply is supportive and positive, indicated by the use of emojis.
- The statement does not cause harm and is supportive in nature, aligning with the principle. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The use of emojis suggests a positive and empathetic tone, promoting understanding and support. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a respectful tone. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to support a viewpoint on a public issue, contributing to civic dialogue. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform responsibly by engaging in a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.