Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement is part of a public discourse as it addresses a significant public issue involving the integrity of the legal process and the prosecution of federal crimes. It highlights concerns about potential political interference in legal proceedings, which is a matter of public interest.
- The statement strives to do no harm by upholding the integrity of the legal process and resisting undue influence. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on the legal and ethical implications rather than personal attacks. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by explaining the reasons for the refusal to drop the case, fostering transparency. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the issue with the Attorney General without resorting to personal attacks. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence for the betterment of society by advocating for the rule of law and ethical governance. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly using the platform to address a public concern with integrity. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.