Michael Schellenberger

The statement criticizes NATO and the Atlantic Council for allegedly supporting censorship, framing it as part of a broader 'Censorship Industrial Complex.' The tone is accusatory and suggests a conspiracy involving military and censorship interests.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement could be seen as harmful by accusing organizations of supporting censorship without providing evidence, potentially spreading misinformation. [-2]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It does not respect the privacy and dignity of the organizations involved, as it makes serious accusations without substantiation. [-2]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it uses a confrontational tone and lacks constructive dialogue. [-2]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, as it makes broad accusations without engaging in a reasoned argument or dialogue. [-2]