Rashida Tlaib

Rank 4 of 47
|
Score 205

The statement is a critique of Republican actions regarding the Department of Education, suggesting they should be transparent and accountable by bringing a bill to the floor rather than relying on an unelected billionaire. The tone is confrontational and challenges the integrity of the political process.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm with words, but its confrontational tone could be seen as provocative.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is accusatory and lacks constructive dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but does not offer constructive dialogue or avoid personal attacks, as it implies cowardice and wrongdoing. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to call for political accountability, which can be seen as an attempt to better society. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to challenge political actions, but the tone could be more responsible and constructive.