Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement is a critique of Republican actions regarding the Department of Education, suggesting they should be transparent and accountable by bringing a bill to the floor rather than relying on an unelected billionaire. The tone is confrontational and challenges the integrity of the political process.
- The statement does not directly harm with words, but its confrontational tone could be seen as provocative.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is accusatory and lacks constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not offer constructive dialogue or avoid personal attacks, as it implies cowardice and wrongdoing. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to call for political accountability, which can be seen as an attempt to better society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to challenge political actions, but the tone could be more responsible and constructive.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.