The statement expresses concern about a perceived shift in priorities regarding AI safety by a prominent figure. It uses a metaphor comparing the situation to a sci-fi horror film, which adds a dramatic tone. The statement implies skepticism and unease about the intentions behind AI development.
- The statement does not directly harm but uses a metaphor that could be seen as sensationalist. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy but questions the integrity of a public figure's commitment.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on criticism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in criticism but does not resort to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.