Gary Marcus

The statement involves a critique of censorship and the dynamics within a private group, suggesting a broader commentary on freedom of speech and the control of information. It touches on public discourse by addressing issues related to AI development strategies and the transparency of tech companies.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm but implies harm by suggesting censorship, which could be seen as a negative action against open dialogue.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects privacy to some extent but indirectly involves individuals by mentioning their actions in a private group, which could be seen as a breach of privacy. [-1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism of the actions of others but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
4. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds free speech by challenging perceived censorship and uses the platform to discuss transparency and openness in AI development. [+1]