Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement and accompanying images engage in public discourse by discussing a government contract and its implications, involving a public figure and a media organization. The tone suggests skepticism and criticism of the relationship between Reuters and the government, implying potential misinformation or misleading actions by Elon Musk. The statement aims to clarify the nature of the contract and its purpose, which is to defend against cyberattacks, not to engage in 'social deception.'
- The statement attempts to clarify misinformation, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by providing context. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy but indirectly questions the integrity of a public figure and organization, which could be seen as a mild violation. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by explaining the contract's purpose, aligning with this principle. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing potential misinformation without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.