Reposted by Marianne Williamson
The statement addresses a public issue concerning the impact of federal government employment policies on local communities in Alaska. It critiques the Trump administration's reduction-in-force order, suggesting that it may have negative consequences for the state.
- The statement suggests that the terminations will do more harm than good, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm by highlighting potential negative impacts. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By discussing the potential harm to Alaskans, the statement promotes understanding and empathy for those affected by the policy. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement critiques a policy decision without engaging in personal attacks, adhering to constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to raise awareness about the potential negative impacts of a policy, aiming for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech responsibly by addressing a public issue with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.