Gary Marcus

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 75
2/15/2025, 5:56:39 AM
X
In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
283d
@markessien Sany could do part-labeling, albeit haptically and orally, far better.

See Landau and Gleitman, Language and Experience: Evidence from the Blind Child.

And of course by definition congenitally blind children don’t have terabytes of visual data like these systems. The questions…
Mark Essien
@markessien
·
283d
@GaryMarcus Now ask a person blind from birth to do the same.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
283d
Ladies and gentleman, I present to you … artificial superintelligence

The conversation involves a discussion on artificial intelligence and its capabilities compared to human abilities, particularly focusing on individuals who are blind from birth. The exchange touches on the limitations and differences in data processing between AI systems and humans, especially those without visual data.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The discussion does not appear to cause harm and is focused on comparing capabilities. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The conversation promotes understanding of the differences between AI and human abilities, particularly in the context of blindness. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The dialogue is constructive, with participants engaging in a reasoned exchange of ideas without personal attacks. [+1]