In reply to:
Tres Leches
@eneldiluvio
·
164d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
164d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing a proposal to reduce military spending, a significant public policy issue. The tone is supportive of the proposal, suggesting it is a positive step regardless of other countries' actions. The intent is to express approval and encourage action on military budget cuts.
- The statement does no harm and supports a peaceful initiative, aligning with the principle. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by supporting a proposal that could lead to reduced military tensions. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by focusing on the proposal's merits rather than attacking individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for societal betterment through reduced military spending. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly discussing a public policy issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.