Michael Schellenberger

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing concerns about government involvement in censorship and plausible deniability. It implies criticism of CISA's actions and suggests a lack of transparency and accountability.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement could potentially cause harm by spreading unverified claims about government actions, which may incite distrust. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It challenges the privacy and dignity of the agency and its representatives by making serious allegations without clear evidence. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it presents a one-sided view without engaging in constructive dialogue. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement lacks constructive criticism and instead makes accusatory claims, which could be seen as a personal attack on the agency. [-1]