Reposted by Robert Costa
Mike Pence
@Mike_Pence
·
6d
The statement by Mike Pence constitutes public discourse as it engages with the public issue of constitutional adherence by the presidency. It references a past article that discusses the importance of the Constitution in governance, implying a critique of current or past presidential actions.
- The statement does not directly cause harm with words or actions, as it is a general commentary on constitutional adherence. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding of the importance of the Constitution in governance, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding and empathy. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, as it focuses on the concept of constitutional adherence rather than targeting individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By discussing the importance of the Constitution, the statement uses influence to potentially better society by encouraging civic awareness and responsibility. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform responsibly by engaging in a substantive issue related to governance. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.