Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with the public issue of AI development, highlighting concerns about the current focus on engineering over fundamental neuroscience and basic research. It calls for a re-balancing of AI research priorities, which is a substantive contribution to the civic dialogue on technology and science.
- The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on a constructive critique of AI development priorities. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting the need for a balance between engineering and fundamental research in AI. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the current state of AI development without resorting to personal attacks. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to advocate for a shift in AI research priorities, which could benefit society by fostering more comprehensive technological advancements. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly discussing AI development issues. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.