In reply to:
The statement engages in a discussion about AI model development and scaling laws, which are relevant public issues in the field of technology and artificial intelligence. The tone is somewhat defensive, seeking recognition for past predictions, and it implies a critique of the current understanding of AI scaling laws.
- The statement does not directly cause harm, but the defensive tone could be seen as slightly confrontational, which might not fully align with striving to do no harm.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It focuses more on seeking credit and recognition rather than fostering a collaborative dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism by questioning the validity of the scaling law, but it also carries a tone of personal grievance, which could detract from constructive dialogue.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes, but rather seeks acknowledgment for a past prediction.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.