In reply to:
AI For Humans Show
@AIForHumansShow
·
280d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
280d
The statement by @AIForHumansShow addresses the importance of credit in the academic process, responding to a conversation about recognition and predictions in AI development. The tone is defensive, highlighting the perceived unfairness of criticism received for making accurate predictions. The statement engages with public discourse as it touches on issues of recognition and credit within the academic and AI communities, which are relevant to broader discussions about intellectual contributions and acknowledgment.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but expresses frustration over criticism, which could be seen as a defensive stance rather than a harmful one.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but rather defends the importance of credit, which aligns with constructive dialogue, though it could be more empathetic.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not acknowledge any mistakes, focusing instead on defending a position.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.