Michael Schellenberger

Rank 39 of 47
|
Score -98
Matt Goodwin
@GoodwinMJ
·
332d
In case you missed:

What I Told Question Time
https://www.mattgoodwin.org/p/wh…
2/16/2025, 5:34:51 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
330d
I have been critical of @BBC in recent years and thus am grateful that it gave me the opportunity to make the case for freedom of speech. Let's hope it represents a vibe shift.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
654d
The head of the @BBC says it will “Pursue the truth with no agenda by reporting fearlessly & fairly.” But, according to current & former BBC journalists, the BBC is suppressing the truth about "gender-affirming care," mislabeling men as women, and failing to safeguard children.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
330d
JD Vance's criticism of EU censorship was outrageous, say Europe's leaders. In fact, it was wholly justified. The only solution to misinformation is accurate information. While BBC sometimes spreads misinformation, it would never occur to me to demand its censorship. Me on @BBC

The statement and its context engage in public discourse by discussing media bias, freedom of speech, and misinformation. The tone is critical and suggests a shift in the media network's approach.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement critiques the media network, which could be seen as constructive criticism, but it lacks specific evidence or examples, potentially leading to harm through vague accusations. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy but could be seen as contributing to a negative portrayal of the media network without detailed evidence.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on criticism without offering solutions or a balanced view. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue or specific examples, which could lead to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [-1]