In reply to:
carstenbergenholtz
@justsomeoneDK
·
280d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
280d
The statement is part of a broader discussion on AI development and the recognition of contributions within the field, which constitutes public discourse. The tone is defensive and critical, expressing frustration over perceived lack of support and recognition from peers.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but expresses personal grievances, which could be seen as indirectly harmful by fostering division. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but criticizes public figures, which is acceptable in public discourse as long as it doesn't devolve into harassment or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks constructive criticism and instead focuses on personal grievances, which could be seen as a form of personal attack. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.