The statement refers to a conversation about technological advancements in augmented reality and AI, which are public issues related to technology's impact on society. The tone is informal and somewhat critical, suggesting skepticism about Yann LeCun's predictions.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as dismissive, which might not fully align with striving to do no harm.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on critiquing the individual's enthusiasm rather than the substance of the technological predictions. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of critique but does not provide constructive criticism or dialogue, as it focuses on the individual's behavior rather than the content of their predictions. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.