In reply to:
Ken Bannan
@bannan_ken
·
145d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
146d
The statement engages in a discussion about the legality of banning certain types of advertisements on television, which is a public issue related to free speech and regulation. The tone is factual and references historical precedent to support the argument.
- The statement does not cause harm and is presented in a factual manner, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by providing a historical example to support the argument, without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech by engaging in a discussion about its limits and implications, using historical context responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.