In reply to:
Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley
@MWS1797
·
278d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
278d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the implications of government job security and the perceived arbitrariness of job cuts, in the context of a broader conversation about the dismantling of USAID and its constitutional implications.
- The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on the issue of job security and arbitrary cuts, adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting concerns about job security and the nature of job cuts, fostering empathy for those affected. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the issue of job security and arbitrary cuts without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.