The statement and image reflect a user's dissatisfaction with a paid AI service, highlighting issues like errors and lack of output. It critiques the value of the service and suggests improvements, such as better models and user control. The tone is critical but not aggressive, focusing on service quality rather than personal attacks.
- The statement does not cause harm and focuses on service quality, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the AI service without personal attacks, aligning with the principle of constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.