Eddie Vedder's Olive Green Shirt
@PlusTime8
·
143d
The statement engages in a discussion about the nature of censorship and funding decisions related to public programs, which is a substantive public issue. The tone is assertive, aiming to clarify the distinction between censorship and funding decisions. The intent is to contribute to the debate on what constitutes censorship, particularly in the context of government actions.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions, as it focuses on clarifying a point of view rather than attacking individuals or groups. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a specific argument about censorship, though it does not directly engage with the opposing viewpoint in a detailed manner. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by participating in a public debate and using the platform to clarify a point of view responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.