Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 47

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing concerns about AI safety and government actions. It supports Hinton's critique of a political figure's understanding of AI and expresses fear over government alliances with AI companies.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aligns with the principle of doing no harm by supporting a call for caution regarding AI dangers. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding by agreeing with a critique that aims to highlight potential risks of AI. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement could be seen as lacking constructive dialogue, as it labels a statement as 'ludicrous nonsense' without further explanation. [-1]