Gary Marcus

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 37
2/17/2025, 2:37:55 PM
X
In reply to:
J₿
@AllCapNoBreak
·
277d
@GaryMarcus @theinformation Well, we need something to balance out the bias over at OpenAI.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
278d
⚠️⚠️⚠️

Everyone—and not just @theinformation—should be genuinely terrified that the richest man in the world has built a Large Language Model that spouts propaganda in his image.

This isn’t free speech. It’s a massive, massive thumb on the scale, from one
of the most powerful…
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
·
278d
Grok 3 is so based 😂

The statement is part of a broader discussion about perceived bias in AI systems and media, touching on issues of free speech and influence by powerful individuals. It suggests a shift in OpenAI's system towards a particular political stance, implying concerns about bias and balance.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement implies a shift in bias, which could be seen as harmful if it misrepresents OpenAI's intentions or actions. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but it questions the integrity of OpenAI's system.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it suggests a negative shift without providing evidence or context. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue or evidence to support the claim. [-1]