The statement critiques influencers for discussing Grok-3 without proper vetting, implying skepticism about their claims. The accompanying image presents a promotional message about Grok-3, emphasizing its capabilities and superiority over other AI models.
- The statement does not directly harm but questions the credibility of influencers, which could be seen as a cautionary note.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy but indirectly questions the integrity of influencers, which could be seen as a mild form of criticism. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not attack individuals personally, focusing instead on the general behavior of influencers. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.