Marianne Williamson

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 57

The statement criticizes the decision to fire FAA staff, suggesting it compromises public safety under the guise of cost-cutting. It implies a disconnect between decision-makers and the consequences of their actions, hinting at hypocrisy by mentioning that the decision-maker does not experience the same risks as the public.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement suggests that the decision to fire FAA staff harms public safety, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm by highlighting potential risks. [+2]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by drawing attention to the potential negative impact of cost-cutting on public safety, fostering empathy for those affected. [+2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement critiques the decision without engaging in personal attacks, focusing on the policy rather than individuals. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    By raising awareness of the potential risks associated with the decision, the statement uses influence to advocate for public safety, contributing to societal betterment. [+2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement responsibly uses free speech to address a public concern, maintaining integrity by focusing on the issue rather than personal attacks. [+1]