Gary Marcus

Rank 20 of 47
|
Score 41
2/18/2025, 5:23:10 AM
X
In reply to:
@ibelieveicanbri
@iBelieveiCanBri
·
272d
@GaryMarcus I get it. I just want to come to you for ai counter intel and sometimes it's hard to tell whether you're being objective or skewed bias influenced by your hatred for Elon's political life and positions.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
272d
@iBelieveiCanBri It’s 15x the compute and a hair better but we will have to see re full o3

And many many benchmarks not shown
@ibelieveicanbri
@iBelieveiCanBri
·
272d
@GaryMarcus So you're saying it's better than all the other models. Got it. Thanks for confirming.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
272d
Longstanding pet peeve: exaggerating something by chopping off the y-axis, instead of running it from zero.

Oh wait, here is a great example!

The statement is part of a discussion about AI models and potential biases in evaluating them. It reflects a personal opinion about objectivity and bias, particularly in relation to a public figure's political life.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm but implies a critical stance, which can be seen as neutral.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects privacy but hints at a personal bias, which could be seen as a mild violation. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on personal opinion.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It engages in dialogue but could be seen as dismissive, lacking constructive criticism. [-1]