The statement critiques claims about AI capabilities, suggesting a competitive dynamic between two figures. It acknowledges the limitations of benchmarks in measuring AI 'smartness' and anticipates a public debate.
- The statement does not directly harm but implies a competitive conflict, which could lead to public tension.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy but hints at a rivalry, which could be seen as provocative. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on competition. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in critique but uses a somewhat sensational tone, anticipating 'fireworks' rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.