Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 45
2/18/2025, 4:18:34 PM
X
In reply to:
Phil Libin
@plibin
·
270d
@GaryMarcus This is a rigorous analysis proving that there won’t be a GPT-6 unless we postulate the existence of some kind of mega-whale the size of an aircraft carrier, which is a clearly implausible concept.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
270d
Two years of promises, half a trillion dollars investment, and still no whale.

The statement humorously critiques the lack of rigorous analysis in discussions about AI development, particularly in the context of GPT models. It engages in public discourse by addressing the expectations and realities of AI advancements.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm and uses humor to make a point, aligning with the principle. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding by highlighting the need for rigorous analysis, aligning with the principle. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue without personal attacks, aligning with the principle. [+1]