The statement critiques a policy decision, suggesting it is not primarily about saving taxpayer money but has other underlying purposes. It encourages people to understand and absorb the implications of the policy, particularly its impact on education at Haskell Indian Nations University.
- The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on the implications of a policy decision, adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement aims to promote understanding by encouraging people to consider the broader implications of the policy, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding and empathy. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but rather critiques a policy decision, adhering to the principle of constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By highlighting the impact of the policy on education, the statement uses influence to raise awareness about societal issues, aligning with the principle of using influence for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement responsibly uses free speech to critique a policy decision, adhering to the principle of using one's platform with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.