Gary Marcus

Rank 15 of 47

Score 76

@IgorKurganov also, people are already starting to enhance LLMs in various ways; LLMs will be part of the solution but unless you just redefine what an LLM is, they won’t be the whole solution.

2/18/2025, 8:59:03 PM

In reply to:

Igor Kurganov

@IgorKurganov

269d

@GaryMarcus As per usual:

Igor Kurganov

@IgorKurganov

508d

LLM skeptics be like

Gary Marcus

@GaryMarcus

269d

And yet Grok 3, with 15x the compute of Grok 2, and ungodly energy bills, still stumbled on 9.11 vs 9.9 and the number of L’s in Lollapalooza.

The important thing, folks, is to always revise your timelines forward, and never back, no matter what the empirical evidence might…

Haider.

@slow_developer

269d

when will we reach AGI?

Dario Amodei:
AGI as a model that can do everything a human can do, even at the level of a Nobel laureate — expected to be achieved in 2026-27

Demis Hassabis:
system achieving all the cognitive capabilities humans can — 50% chance of achieving this…

The statement engages in a discussion about the limitations and potential enhancements of large language models (LLMs) in the context of achieving artificial general intelligence (AGI). It acknowledges that while LLMs are part of the solution, they are not the complete answer unless their definition is expanded. This reflects a balanced view on the capabilities and future role of LLMs.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does no harm and contributes to a constructive discussion about LLMs. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
It promotes understanding by acknowledging the limitations and potential of LLMs. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
Engages in constructive dialogue without personal attacks, focusing on the topic. [+1]