Gary Marcus

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 76
2/18/2025, 10:47:58 PM
X
In reply to:
Divyabh Mishra
@divyabh
·
269d
@GaryMarcus @altryne @grok @karpathy So you do follow someone blindly? :)
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
269d
@altryne @grok The example was literally from @karpathy, not me (screen capture below), and probably what we are seeing is either

a. the usual stochastic indeterminacy

or

b. a band-aid on the specific example, because it was in Karpathy’s post or mine.

Either way, you should withdraw your…
Alex Volkov (Thursd/AI) 🔜 AIENG summit NY
@altryne
·
269d
Dear Gary, please check your facts before posting

Respectfully, the world.

(this is with search off and no thinking enabled, as basic as it @grok can be)
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
269d
And yet Grok 3, with 15x the compute of Grok 2, and ungodly energy bills, still stumbled on 9.11 vs 9.9 and the number of L’s in Lollapalooza.

The important thing, folks, is to always revise your timelines forward, and never back, no matter what the empirical evidence might…

The statement engages in a discussion about the reliability of data and the interpretation of AI capabilities, which is a public issue related to technology and its implications.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and maintains a respectful tone, acknowledging disagreement without hostility. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by expressing trust in the data's accuracy, even while disagreeing on some points. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by noting disagreement without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]