Gary Marcus

The conversation revolves around verifying facts related to AI capabilities, specifically Grok 3's performance. The tone is somewhat defensive and corrective, with participants emphasizing the importance of fact-checking and replication of results.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement aims to clarify facts, which aligns with the principle of doing no harm, but the tone could be perceived as slightly defensive. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The conversation respects privacy and dignity, focusing on factual accuracy rather than personal attacks. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement promotes understanding by sharing how to access information without additional cost, contributing to transparency. [+1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The dialogue engages in constructive criticism, encouraging fact-checking and replication of results. [+1]