Michael Schellenberger

Rank 39 of 47

Score -98

-1

President Donald Trump’s cuts to USAID were cruel, said Democrats and the media. Indeed, they argue, the underlying cause of most of society’s problems is lack of empathy. If only we were kinder and gentler with each other, they say, we would finally be able to end poverty,…

2/19/2025, 1:14:50 AM

In reply to:

Michael Shellenberger

@shellenberger

328d

Trump's cuts to USAID epitomize cruelty, say the media. But they don't. USAID had turned the weapons of regime change against the American people. As such, the case typified the ways in which progressives have weaponized compassion to undermine human rights & democracy.

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the implications of Trump's cuts to USAID and the broader societal issues of empathy and compassion. It critiques the media and Democrats' perspective, suggesting that their focus on empathy is misguided and potentially harmful.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement critiques the media and Democrats, suggesting their views are harmful, which could be seen as a violation of striving to do no harm. [-1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
It challenges the notion of empathy as a solution, which may not promote understanding or compassion, potentially violating this principle. [-1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in criticism of opposing views, but it does not resort to personal attacks, aligning with this principle. [+1]