Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement accuses an organization of altering data to cover up a mistake, using strong language and providing evidence to support the claim. It engages in public discourse by addressing transparency and accountability in public data handling.
- The statement uses strong language that could be considered harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of the organization it accuses, potentially engaging in cyberbullying or harassment. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, as it uses accusatory and harsh language rather than fostering dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.