Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
In reply to:
Igor Kurganov
@IgorKurganov
·
143d

The conversation involves a debate about AI capabilities and predictions, with a focus on interpreting statements and the tone of the discussion. The participants are engaging in a back-and-forth about the meaning of a prediction related to AI intelligence and the terms of a proposed bet.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm but expresses disagreement with the tone of the previous message.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy but notes discomfort with the tone, which could be seen as a mild critique of respect. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the tone and interpretation without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]