Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement addresses a public issue regarding the failure of a city clerk to notify the media about a special meeting, which is required by law. This is part of a broader discussion about government transparency and the legality of a court order directing a newspaper to delete an editorial. The tone is somewhat informal and critical, highlighting a lapse in procedure and its implications.
- The statement does not cause harm but highlights a procedural error, which is important for public awareness. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy and dignity, focusing on procedural issues rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding of legal requirements and government transparency. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive criticism of the city's actions without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to inform the public about governmental accountability. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- It upholds free speech by discussing the implications of a court order on media freedom. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.