In reply to:
Mike Butcher (BlueSky/Threads: @mikebutcher)
@mikebutcher
·
138d
The statement by Gary Marcus constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about the development and evaluation of AI technology, specifically Grok 3, and its implications. The statement critiques the effectiveness of scaling in AI, which is a significant public issue given the impact of AI on society.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It focuses on a technical critique rather than personal attacks.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing evaluations and critiques of Grok 3, contributing to the public's knowledge about AI development. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by evaluating the AI technology rather than attacking individuals personally. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not explicitly acknowledge or correct mistakes, but it does provide a platform for ongoing dialogue and critique.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to responsibly critique a public issue, contributing to the discourse on AI. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.