Marianne Williamson

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 57

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing immigration policy and its ethical implications, referencing religious texts to critique current practices. The tone is sarcastic, suggesting a perceived hypocrisy in selectively applying religious teachings.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses sarcasm to highlight perceived inconsistencies in policy, which may not directly harm but could be seen as dismissive.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The use of the term 'illegals' in the conversation could be considered disrespectful and dehumanizing, potentially violating the principle of respecting dignity. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement attempts to promote empathy by referencing religious teachings about kindness to strangers, aligning with this principle. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The sarcastic tone may hinder constructive dialogue, as it could be perceived as mocking rather than engaging in reasoned debate. [-1]