Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
Michael A. Horowitz
@michaelh992
·
2d
The statement discusses a serious and sensitive issue involving the alleged murder of children, which is part of a broader public discourse on violence and conflict. The tone is accusatory and emotionally charged, using the word 'savage' to describe the act.
- The statement uses emotionally charged language that could contribute to harm by inciting anger or hatred, thus violating the principle of doing no harm. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of those involved by using dehumanizing language ('savage'), which could be considered as contributing to hate speech. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on the brutality of the act without fostering dialogue or understanding. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses inflammatory language rather than seeking to understand or discuss the broader context. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.