In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
328d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing government policy on data privacy and corporate resistance. It criticizes the UK government's actions and praises Apple's stance, framing the issue as a matter of freedom and privacy.
- The statement uses strong language, potentially inciting fear and distrust, which may not align with striving to do no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It accuses the UK Prime Minister of being a tyrant, which could be seen as disrespectful and a personal attack. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement attempts to promote understanding of privacy issues but does so in a polarizing manner.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in personal attacks rather than constructive criticism. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.