Michael Schellenberger

Rank 45 of 47
|
Score -120
2/21/2025, 4:45:12 PM
X
In reply to:
X Ghosted
@_UserEx_
·
328d
@shellenberger @tim_cook I believe it was the best option, let the people know what happened and why. They run a business and have to conform to the laws of the country they are operating in.

People can always use their own encryption as a workaround.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
328d
@tim_cook It’s true that Apple could have just quit the UK rather than accede to the governments demands, and in that sense it caved in. But it’s hard to see a publicly traded company responsible to shareholders doing that and so it appears to have chosen the best of two bad options. I may…
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
328d
@tim_cook Here’s the context for this. The UK government is one of the most totalitarian in the world!
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
926d
UK politician @DamianCollins says he just wants to protect kids but he doesn’t. He wants to turn the Internet — worldwide — into a police state. No more private messages because criminals use them. What’s next, cameras in every home? Warrantless searches? Please stop this maniac.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
328d
@tim_cook Look what the UK creeps demanded:

“As part of its order to Apple, the UK asked it for access to global user data, Bloomberg News reported. The mandate orders Apple to provide access under the UK’s Investigatory Powers Act, a law that granted officials the authority to compel…
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
328d
Thank you @tim_cook for standing strong against tyranny! 🇺🇸🇬🇧✊🏼
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
328d
“Customers already using Advanced Data Protection, or ADP, will need to manually disable it during an unspecified grace period to keep their iCloud accounts.

“The company said it will issue additional guidance in the future to affected users and that it does not have the…

The statement 'Yep' is a brief agreement with a previous comment about Apple's decision to comply with UK laws while suggesting users can use their own encryption. The conversation involves a discussion on privacy, government demands, and corporate responsibility.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but supports a viewpoint that could be seen as accepting of government overreach.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy by acknowledging the use of personal encryption as a workaround. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding by agreeing with a nuanced view of the situation. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    Engages in constructive dialogue by supporting a reasoned argument without personal attacks. [+1]